4.6 Article

Electrical Tuning of Optical Properties of Quantum Dot-Graphene Hybrid Devices: Interplay of Charge and Energy Transfer

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 125, 期 15, 页码 8314-8322

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00643

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology and Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  2. DST, Inspire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optical properties of hybrid semiconductor quantum dots (QD) and single-layer graphene (SLG) devices are controlled by the interplay of energy transfer and charge transfer between the QDs and SLG, and can be tuned by electrostatic doping and adjusting the distance between QDs.
The combination of semiconductor quantum dots (QD) and single-layer graphene (SLG) can lead to the formation of optoelectronic devices with enhanced sensitivity and can have extensive applications in the field of the photodetector and photovoltaics. The optical properties of the resultant hybrid material are controlled by the interplay of energy transfer between QDs and charge transfer between the QDs and SLG. By studying the steady-state and time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy of hybrid QD-SLG devices, we observe a subtle interplay of short- and long-range energy transfer between cadmium selenide (CdSe) QDs in a compact monolayer solid film placed in close proximity to an SLG and the charge transfer from the QD solid to SLG. At larger separation, delta, between the compact monolayer QD and SLG, the emission properties are dominated by mutual energy transfer between the QDs. At relatively smaller separation the emission from QDs, which is strongly quenched, is dominated by charge transfer between QDs and SLG. In addition, we are also able to tune the relative strength of energy and charge transfer by electrostatic doping through the back gate voltage, which provides a novel pathway to tune emission properties of these devices for possible applications as photodetectors, in photovoltaics, and for sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据