4.5 Article

Reversible Hydration of α-Dicarbonyl Compounds from Ab Initio Metadynamics Simulations: Comparison between Pyruvic and Glyoxylic Acids in Aqueous Solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 11, 页码 2942-2951

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c09748

关键词

-

资金

  1. Investissements d'Avenir LabEx PALM of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-LABX-0039-PALM]
  2. ANR DYNAAMIX project of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE29-0001-01]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE29-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that glyoxylic and pyruvic acids exhibit high conformational diversity in aqueous solutions, with the gem-diol form strongly favored over the oxo form in water. Through atomic-scale simulations, new insights into reaction mechanisms were provided, focusing on hydrogen-bond arrangements and the electronic structure of the transition state.
Glyoxylic and pyruvic oxoacids are widely available in the atmosphere as gas-phase clusters and particles or in wet aerosols. In aqueous conditions, they undergo interconversion between the unhydrated oxo and gem-diol forms, where two hydroxyl groups replace the carbonyl group. We here examine the hydration equilibrium of glyoxylic and pyruvic acids with first-principles simulations in water at ambient conditions using ab initio metadynamics to reconstruct the corresponding free-energy landscapes. The main results are as follows: (i) our simulations reveal the high conformational diversity of these species in aqueous solutions. (ii) We show that gem-diol is strongly favored in water compared to its oxo counterpart by 29 and 16 kJ/mol for glyoxylic and pyruvic acids, respectively. (iii) From our atomic-scale simulations, we present new insights into the reaction mechanisms with a special focus on hydrogen-bond arrangements and the electronic structure of the transition state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据