4.5 Article

Study of the Photoluminescence Characteristics of 4,4′((1E,1′E)-Quinoxaline-2,3-diylbis(ethene-2,1-diyl))bis(N,N-dimethylaniline)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 16, 页码 4132-4140

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c00655

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573094, 11774112, 11904123, 61575079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative investigation on the photophysical properties of a quinoxaline derivative QDMA2 was conducted using various spectroscopies. It was found that a solvent-stabilized charge-transfer state plays a role in the relaxation process of excited QDMA2, and the aggregated QDMA2 molecules exhibit a correlated color temperature value in organic light-emitting diode testing. Pressure-dependent photoluminescence of aggregated QDMA2 suggests that intermolecular interactions can impact the color and intensity of photoluminescence by adjusting the band gap and irradiative channel of the molecules.
A comparative investigation on the photophysical properties of a quinoxaline derivative 4,4'-((1E,1'E)-quinoxaline-2,3-diylbis(ethene-2,1-diyl))bis(N,N-dimethylaniline) (QDMA2) was performed by employing many spectroscopies. Based on the pump-dump/push-probe measurement, it is found that a solvent-stabilized charge-transfer state can participate in the relaxation of excited QDMA2 with increasing solvent polarity. Meanwhile, the aggregated QDMA2 molecules were engineered into the organic light-emitting diode test, which showed a correlated color temperature value of 1875 K. With the help of a diamond anvil cell, the pressure-dependent photoluminescence of aggregated QDMA2 shows that the intermolecular interaction can affect the color and intensity of photoluminescence through adjusting the band gap and irradiative channel of the aggregated molecules. These results are important for understanding the structure-property relationships and the rational design of functional materials for optoelectronic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据