4.6 Article

Valence Photoelectron Spectra of Liquid Methanol and Ethanol Measured Using He II Radiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 125, 期 12, 页码 2492-2503

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c00288

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K14178, JP20K15229, JP15H05753]
  2. Mitsubishi Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-resolution photoelectron spectra of liquid methanol and ethanol were measured using a liquid microjet and He II alpha radiation. The spectra of both liquids showed a slight shift in band positions compared to gaseous samples. Differences in the lowest ionization bands were found to originate from nuclear dynamics.
High-resolution photoelectron (PE) spectra of liquid methanol and ethanol were measured using a liquid microjet and He II alpha radiation (40.813 eV). The vertical ionization energy and the ionization threshold were determined as 9.70 +/- 0.07 and 8.69 +/- 0.07 eV for methanol and 9.52 +/- 0.07 and 8.52 +/- 0.07 eV for ethanol, respectively. Individual photoemission bands observed for the liquids are well correlated with those in PE spectra of the gaseous samples also measured in the present study, except that the liquid band positions were shifted on average by -1.23 eV for methanol and -1.10 eV for ethanol as compared to the gas. The 5a' and 7a' bands of liquid methanol exhibit specifically larger broadening than other bands, for which we attempted spectral fitting with two components, similarly with the case of the 3a(1) band of liquid water. PE spectra of both liquid and gaseous ethanol are congested partly due to the presence of the trans and gauche isomers; however, the overall band positions are generally in good agreement with predictions based on quantum chemical calculations. Comparison of the measured PE spectra with experimental and simulated X-ray emission spectra indicate that spectral differences in the lowest ionization band of both methanol and ethanol originate from involvement of nuclear dynamics in the X-ray emission process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据