4.6 Article

Extension of the Variational Free Energy Profile and Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio Methods for High-Dimensional Potential of Mean Force Profile Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 125, 期 19, 页码 4216-4232

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c00736

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM107485, GM062248, S10OD012346]
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562, TG-CHE190067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The variational free energy profile (vFEP) method was redeveloped using a cardinal B-spline basis to extend the analysis of free energy surfaces involving three or more reaction coordinates. A software for evaluating high-dimensional profiles based on the multistate Bennett acceptance ratio (MBAR) method was implemented, allowing for construction of unbiased probability densities and solving nonlinear optimization of a convex function. Comparisons between vFEP and MBAR methods showed that vFEP is faster for periodic 2D profiles, while MBAR is faster for unbounded 3D profiles.
We redevelop the variational free energy profile (vFEP) method using a cardinal B-spline basis to extend the method for analyzing free energy surfaces (FESs) involving three or more reaction coordinates. We also implemented software for evaluating high-dimensional profiles based on the multistate Bennett acceptance ratio (MBAR) method which constructs an unbiased probability density from global reweighting of the observed samples. The MBAR method takes advantage of a fast algorithm for solving the unbinned weighted histogram (UWHAM)/MBAR equations which replaces the solution of simultaneous equations with a nonlinear optimization of a convex function. We make use of cardinal B-splines and multiquadric radial basis functions to obtain smooth, differentiable MBAR profiles in arbitrary high dimensions. The cardinal B-spline vFEP and MBAR methods are compared using three example systems that examine 1D, 2D, and 3D profiles. Both methods are found to be useful and produce nearly indistinguishable results. The vFEP method is found to be 150 times faster than MBAR when applied to periodic 2D profiles, but the MBAR method is 4.5 times faster than vFEP when evaluating unbounded 3D profiles. In agreement with previous comparisons, we find the vFEP method produces superior FESs when the overlap between umbrella window simulations decreases. Finally, the associative reaction mechanism of hammerhead ribozyme is characterized using 3D, 4D, and 6D profiles, and the higher-dimensional profiles are found to have smaller reaction barriers by as much as 1.5 kcal/mol. The methods presented here have been implemented into the FE-ToolKit software package along with new methods for network-wide free energy analysis in drug discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据