4.6 Article

Insight into the Thiol-yne Kinetics via a Computational Approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 125, 期 17, 页码 3556-3568

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c11599

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marmara University Scientific Research Projects Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thiol-yne reactions have been studied systematically to understand the structural influences of thiol and alkyne functionalities on the reaction pathways, shedding light on the reaction kinetics, structure-reactivity relations, and E/Z diastereoselectivity of the products. Results suggest that spin density, stability of sulfur radicals, and intramolecular p-p stacking interactions are key factors affecting the reaction rates and Z diastereoselectivity.
Thiol-yne reactions have drawn attention because of the click nature as well as the regular step-growth network nature of their products, despite the radical-mediated reactant. However, the factors governing the reaction pathways have not been examined using quantum chemical tools in a comprehensive manner. Thereupon, we have systematically investigated the mechanism of thiol-yne reactions, focusing on the structural influences of thiol and alkyne functionalities. The reaction kinetics, structure-reactivity relations, and E/Z diastereoselectivity of the products have been enlightened for the first cycle of the thiol-yne polymerization reaction. For this reason, a diverse set of 11 thiol-yne reactions with four thiols and eight alkynes was modeled by means of density functional theory. We performed a benchmark study and determined the M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory as the best cost-effective methodology to model such reactions. Results reveal that spin density, the stabilities of sulfur radicals for propagation, and the stability of alkenyl intermediate radicals for the chain transfer are the determining factors of each reaction rate. Intramolecular p-p stacking interactions at transition-state structures are found to be responsible for Z diastereoselectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据