4.5 Article

Prevalence, birth incidence, and penetrance of von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL) in Denmark

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 301-307

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.173

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Cancer Society of von Hippel-Lindau patients and their relatives
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Danish association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL) is a rare hereditary tumour predisposition with multiorgan involvement that is not always easily recognized. The disease is reported to be almost fully penetrant at age 60 years. Previous estimates of vHL prevalence and incidence are all regional and vary widely. Most are > 20 years old and prone to selection bias because of inclusion of only clinically affected vHL patients who were diagnosed before genetic testing was available. In an unselected cohort of all known Danish carriers of a disease-causing VHL variant, we assessed vHL penetrance on a national basis. We further used national health registers to identify individuals who fulfilled the clinical diagnostic vHL criteria based on their registered diagnostic codes, but had not been diagnosed with vHL. We also assessed the medical histories of first-degree relatives to identify familial cases. This study gives the first national estimates of vHL prevalence (1 in 46 900 individuals) and birth incidence (1 in 27 300 live births). vHL has been underdiagnosed in Denmark, and as many as 25% of the overall vHL cohort (diagnosed+undiagnosed patients) have a missed diagnosis in spite of fulfilling the international diagnostic criteria. We found an overall penetrance of 87% at age 60 years. When considering only vHL patients who have not attended surveillance, 20% will still be asymptomatic at age 60 years. This should be considered in the context of genetic counselling, especially when assessing the risk of vHL in asymptomatic adult first-degree relatives who are often not genetically tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据