Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Investigation and Treatment of Growth Hormone Deficiency

Objective To determine if the racial/ethnic inequity in growth hormone (GH) use is due to differences in GH stimulation testing and/or prescribing patterns in children referred for endocrine evaluation of short stature. Study design Retrospective chart review was performed including children aged 2-16 years, height z-score of <=-1.5, and of non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), or Hispanic race/ethnicity, referred for endocrine growth evaluation between January 2012 and December 2019. Results This study included 7425 children (5905 NHW, 800 NHB, and 720 Hispanic). GH stimulation testing was performed in 992, and 576 were prescribed GH. NHW children were 1.4 (95% CI, 1.04-1.8) times more likely than NHB children and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-2.2) times more likely than Hispanic children to undergo GH stimulation testing. GH-treated NHB children had (1) a lower median peak GH concentration when compared with NHW (P=.02) and Hispanic (P=.08) children (NHB 4.7 ng/mL [95% CI, 1.2-8.3 ng/mL] ng/mL, NHW 7.2 ng/mL [95% CI, 4.9-9.7 ng/mL], Hispanic 7.1 ng/mL [95% CI, 4.3-11.9 ng/mL]); (2) lower median height z-scores than NHW (P=.01) but not Hispanic children (P=.5); and (3) a greater height deficit from midparental height when compared with NHW (P=.01) and Hispanic (P =.002) children. Conclusions Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the evaluation and treatment of children with disordered growth. This likely results from both overinvestigation of NHW children as well as underinvestigation and undertreatment of children from minority communities. The evaluation and treatment of children with short stature should be determined by clinical concern alone, but this is not current practice.

Automated summary

Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the evaluation and treatment of children with disordered growth. This likely results from both overinvestigation of NHW children as well as underinvestigation and undertreatment of children from minority communities. The evaluation and treatment of children with short stature should be determined by clinical concern alone, but this is not current practice.