4.2 Article

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategy for pregnant women in Japan

期刊

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 1958-1964

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.14748

关键词

adverse effects; COVID-19; pregnancy; vaccine

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [20CA2033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current COVID-19 pandemic is a global concern, with the recent introduction of vaccines providing hope but also giving rise to new issues such as vaccine hesitancy. The safety of vaccines for pregnant women has become a key topic, with recommendations published by Japanese medical societies addressing this issue.
The current COVID-19 pandemic is a global concern. The recent introduction of vaccines has provided a reason for hope, but new problems, such as vaccine hesitancy, have arisen. One of the most important of these issues is the safety of vaccines for pregnant women. In this article, we collected worldwide indications for vaccination, including women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant, and reports of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccination. The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Japanese Society of Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology have published recommendations for the vaccination of pregnant women with a COVID-19 vaccine. The guidelines are as follows: (1) pregnant women should not be excluded from vaccination; (2) informed consent should be obtained before vaccination; (3) healthcare workers and pregnant women with complications such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity should be vaccinated preferentially; (4) vaccination should be avoided until 12 weeks of gestation during organogenesis; (5) spouse and family members should be vaccinated actively; and (6) nursing mothers are not particularly affected. This policy has been adopted in government guidelines. Additional efforts should be made to protect pregnant women from infection and severe illness with COVID-19 by eliminating vaccine hesitancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据