4.7 Article

Accommodation and diffusion of Nd in uranium silicide - U3Si2

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 547, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152794

关键词

First -principle calculations; Diffusion behaviors; U3Si2; Burnup indicator

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201700260222]
  2. Ser Cymru II program through the Welsh European Funding Office (WEFO) under the European Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uranium silicide U3Si2 is considered as an advanced nuclear fuel for commercial light water reactors, and studies have shown that the diffusion rate of Neodymium in this concept fuel is faster than in conventional oxide fuels. Therefore, Neodymium can be considered as a burnup indicator in U3Si2.
Uranium silicide, U3Si2, is considered as an advanced nuclear fuel for commercial light water reactors with improved accident tolerance as well as competitive economics. Nd is employed as a local burnup indicator for conventional oxide fuels due, among other reasons, to its low mobility in the UO2 fuel matrix and its high fission product yield. As part of the studies necessary to determine whether Nd can be considered as a candidate burnup indicator in the U3Si2 concept fuel, we investigate the mobility of Nd in U3Si2. In this work, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are performed to predict the most stable accommodation sites of Nd in U3Si2, found to be within the uranium sublattice. Based on DFT calculations of binding energies and migration activation energies, we investigate Nd diffusion by computing the transport coefficients within the framework of the self-consistent mean-field method. Our calculations predict that the diffusion ratio of Nd to U is smaller in U3Si2 than in UO2. Moreover, at the individual maximum centerline temperature of the fuel, the diffusion of Nd in U3Si2 is much slower than in UO2. From this perspective, Nd represents a good candidate burnup indicator, in similarity to that in UO2. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据