4.2 Article

Imaging of cardiac fibroblast activation in a patient after acute myocardial infarction using 68Ga-FAPI-04

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 2254-2261

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02603-z

关键词

CAD; myocardial ischemia and infarction; PET; hybrid imaging; diagnostic and prognostic application; molecular imaging agents

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [764458]
  2. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated the feasibility of noninvasive imaging of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression after myocardial infarction (MI) using Ga-68-FAPI-04-PET, and showed that Ga-68-FAPI-04 uptake extends beyond the actual infarcted area in the infarct territory. Follow-up CMR confirmed the overestimation of the infarct size by Ga-68-FAPI-04 uptake.
Our previous study has demonstrated the feasibility of noninvasive imaging of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-expression after myocardial infarction (MI) in MI-territory in a rat model with Ga-68-FAPI-04-PET. In the current extended clinical case, we sought to delineate cardiac uptake of Ga-68-FAPI-04 in a patient after MI with clinical indication for the evidence of fibroblast activation. Carcinoma patients without cardiac disease underwent Ga-68-FAPI-04-PET/CT as control. The patient with one-vessel disease underwent dynamic Ga-68-FAPI-04-cardiac-PET/CMR for 60 minutes. Correlation of cardiac Ga-68-FAPI-04 uptake with clinical findings, ECG, echocardiography, coronary-arteriography and enhanced cardiac-MRI with T1 MOLLI and ECV mapping were performed. No uptake was found in normal myocardium and in mature scar. A focal intense Ga-68-FAPI-04 uptake with continuous wash-out in the infarct territory of coronary occlusion correlating with T1 and ECV mapping was observed. The uptake of Ga-68-FAPI-04 extends beyond the actual infarcted area and overestimates the infarct size as confirmed by follow-up CMR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据