4.5 Article

Application of a Particle Filter to Flaw Identification for Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation: Assimilation of Simulated and Measured Data

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-021-00765-x

关键词

Ultrasonics; Data assimilation; Particle filter; Identification of flaw geometry; Parallel computing with GPU

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19K21987, 20H02230]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K21987, 20H02230] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study applies a particle filter (PF) to identify flaw geometry in ultrasonic nondestructive testing, merging simulation data with measured data using a probabilistic approach to deal with errors and enhance accuracy and convergence speed.
The assimilation of simulated and measured data is essential for advancing technology in NDE 4.0. In this study, a particle filter (PF) was applied to identify the geometry of flaws for ultrasonic nondestructive testing. A PF based on a probabilistic approach that allows errors in measurement and simulation models may be of great assistance for the data assimilation. In the PF, state variables are expressed by random data samples called particles, together with their associated weights. The PF estimates the probabilistic density function of the state variables by merging simulation data with measured data. Data types must be physically identical in the simulation and measurement to enhance the accuracy and to accelerate the convergence speed in the PF. Here, the scattering component, which is specific information related to the flaw geometry, was used for the likelihood evaluation in the PF. The simulation, which needed many particles, was conducted using the elastodynamic finite integration technique accelerated by parallel computing with graphics processing units. The proposed PF approach was demonstrated in ultrasonic measurement, and the geometries of artificial flaws in aluminum specimens were identified using only one pulse-echo signal at a single transducer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据