4.4 Review

Neuronal mechanisms underlying opioid-induced respiratory depression: our current understanding

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 5, 页码 1899-1919

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00017.2021

关键词

breathing; neuromodulation; OIRD; opioid; respiration

资金

  1. IRSF (International Rett Syndrome Foundation) [R01 HL144801, R01 HL126523, P01 HL090554, R01 DA047978, R00 DA038069, 3608]
  2. [T32 HL134621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opioid-induced respiratory depression is the primary cause of death associated with therapeutic and recreational opioid use, with the death rate from opioid abuse growing disproportionally in the United States since the early 1990s. Despite uncovering many fundamental cellular and systems-level mechanisms related to opioid-related death, factors such as individual vulnerability, neuromodulatory compensation, and redundancy of opioid effects continue to hinder the formation of a concise, integrative view of OIRD. This review brings together multiple perspectives in the field of OIRD to create a comprehensive understanding of this important research topic and its future direction.
Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) represents the primary cause of death associated with therapeutic and recreational opioid use. Within the United States, the rate of death from opioid abuse since the early 1990s has grown disproportionally, prompting the classification as a nationwide epidemic. Since this time, we have begun to unravel many fundamental cellular and systemslevel mechanisms associated with opioid-related death. However, factors such as individual vulnerability, neuromodulatory compensation, and redundancy of opioid effects across central and peripheral nervous systems have created a barrier to a concise, integrative view of OIRD. Within this review, we bring together multiple perspectives in the field of OIRD to create an overarching viewpoint of what we know, and where we view this essential topic of research going forward into the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据