4.3 Article

Expression and Prognostic Value of the Immune Checkpoints Galectin-9 and PD-L1 in Glioblastomas

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlab041

关键词

Co-expression; Galectin-9; Glioblastoma; Immunotherapy; PD-L1; Prognosis

资金

  1. University of Southern Denmark
  2. Odense University Hospital
  3. Hede Nielsen Family Foundation
  4. Agnethe Lovgreens grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that both Galectin-9 and PD-L1 proteins were expressed in all investigated GBMs, with the majority of patients showing co-expression, which may provide a rationale for multi-targeted immune checkpoint inhibition.
Immunotherapeutic targeting of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis has been widely implemented for treatment of several cancer types but shown disappointing results in glioblastomas (GBMs), potentially due to compensatory mechanisms of other expressed immune checkpoints. Galectin-9 is an immune-checkpoint protein that facilitates T-cell exhaustion and apoptosis and could be a potential target for immune-checkpoint inhibition. A total of 163 GBMs IDH wildtype were immunostained with anti-Galectin-9 and PD-L1 antibodies. Software-based quantitation of immunostainings was performed and co-expression was investigated using double immunofluorescence. Both Galectin-9 and PD-L1 protein expression were found in all 163 tumors and showed a significant positive correlation (p = 0.0017). Galectin-9 expression varied from 0.01% to 32% (mean = 6.61%), while PD-L1 membrane expression ranged from 0.003% to 0.14% (mean = 0.048%) of total tumor area. Expression of Galectin-9 and PD-L1 was found on both microglia/macrophages and tumor cells, and colocalization of both markers was found in 88.3% of tumors. In multivariate analysis, neither Galectin-9 (HR = 0.99), PD-L1 (HR = 1.05), nor their combinations showed prognostic value. Galectin-9 and PD-L1 were expressed in all investigated GBMs and the majority of patients had co-expression, which may provide rationale for multi-targeted immune checkpoint inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据