4.7 Review

Efficacy and safety of perampanel in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: cohort study of 81 patients and literature review

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 268, 期 10, 页码 3744-3757

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10506-9

关键词

Perampanel; Refractory status epilepticus; Super-refractory status epilepticus; Modified Rankin Scale scores; Status epilepticus

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan [CORPG3J0491, CORPG3J0461]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perampanel shows effectiveness and satisfactory safety profile in the emergency treatment of established refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus. Patients with unique types and causes of SE, particularly nonconvulsive status epilepticus, may have a better response to perampanel treatment.
Background The effective dose of perampanel in status epilepticus (SE), refractory SE (RSE), and super-refractory SE (SRSE) in humans is unknown, and the potential of perampanel in treating SE has not been evaluated in a large cohort. Methods Data of intensive care patients with RSE and SRSE treated with perampanel were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results Eighty-one patients received perampanel, including 39 females with median age 64 [17-91] years, perampanel responders (n = 27), and non-responders (n = 54). The initial perampanel dose was positively associated with treatment response in patients with RSE or SRSE (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.57, p = 0.025), while the maximum dose was negatively associated with treatment response (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96, p = 0.022). Hypoxia caused seizures in six patients; five died in hospital and one had severe disability. A statistically non-significant tendency toward better response was found in patients with unique SE type and cause, particularly in nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) without coma (NCSE without coma vs. generalized tonic-clonic seizure: OR = 4.14, 95% CI 0.98-17.47, p = 0.053). In the high-dose (>= 16 mg/day) groups, although distributions of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were similar between perampanel responders and non-responders at discharge, a greater proportion of perampanel responders had less change in mRS scores from baseline than did perampanel non-responders (median mRS: 0 vs 4, p = 0.064). No cardiorespiratory adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were noted with perampanel treatment. Conclusions Perampanel is effective and has a satisfactory safety profile in the emergency treatment of established RSE and SRSE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据