4.5 Article

Activation of spinal PDGFRβ in microglia promotes neuronal autophagy via p38 MAPK pathway in morphine-tolerant rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 158, 期 2, 页码 373-390

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15383

关键词

autophagy; morphine tolerance; p38; PDGFR beta

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771191, 81974168, 81471143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that spinal PDGFR beta in microglia promotes autophagy in GABA interneurons through activating the p38 MAPK pathway, which plays a significant role in the development of morphine tolerance.
The adverse side effects of opioids, especially antinociceptive tolerance, limit their clinical application. A recent study reported that platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR beta) blockage selectively inhibited morphine tolerance. Autophagy has been reported to contribute to the cellular and behavioral responses to morphine. However, little is known about the relationship between PDGFR beta and autophagy in the mechanisms of morphine tolerance. In this study, rats were intrathecally administered with morphine twice daily for 7 days to induce antinociceptive tolerance, which was evaluated using a tail-flick latency test. By administration autophagy inhibitor 3-Methyladenine, PDGFR beta inhibitor imatinib, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor SB203580 hydrochloride and minocycline hydrochloride, western blot, immunofluorescence, and transmission electron microscopy techniques were used to elucidate the roles of PDGFR beta, autophagy, and related signaling pathways in morphine tolerance. This study demonstrated for the first time that spinal PDGFR beta in microglia promotes autophagy in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons through activating p38 MAPK pathway during the development of morphine tolerance, which suggest a potential strategy for preventing the development of morphine tolerance clinically, thereby improving the use of opioids in pain management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据