4.5 Article

Process design and network shape evaluation of multi-target collaborative navigation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 968-984

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0373463321000229

关键词

communications; integrated navigation system (INS); multi-sensor navigation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the importance of spatial distribution of collaborative targets and the information collaboration process in real-time collaborative navigation efficiency. By designing a collaborative communication process and analyzing the spatial distribution conditions of collaborative targets, a method based on CGDOP value is proposed for evaluation. A simulated experiment is conducted to evaluate the collaboration effect in different spatial shapes, optimizing navigation data efficiency and improving stability and reliability of real-time navigation service.
The spatial distribution of collaborative targets and the information collaboration process are two important factors affecting the efficiency of real-time collaborative navigation. Addressing these factors, this paper presents the following work. First, the collaborative communication process between navigation targets is designed and illustrated with an application example. Second, the feature and error condition of the spatial distribution of collaborative targets is analysed. Then, a method based on CGDOP (collaborative geometric dilution of precision) value is proposed for the evaluation of the actual spatial distribution conditions of collaborative targets. Finally, a simulated experiment is conducted to evaluate the collaborative navigation process and the collaboration effect of the collaborative navigation network in different spatial shapes. Overall, the results of this study optimised the observation and application efficiency of navigation data, and improved the stability and reliability of real-time navigation service through multi-target collaborative navigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据