4.7 Article

Semisynthesis, Antiplasmodial Activity, and Mechanism of Action Studies of Isocoumarin Derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 1434-1441

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c01032

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1706210, 41776141, U1606403]
  2. AoShan Talents Program - Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [2015ASTP-ES11]
  3. Program of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [JQ201510]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201841004]
  5. Taishan Scholars Program, China
  6. National System of Investigation of Panama (SNI)
  7. National Secretariat of Science and Technology (SENACYT) [FID 17-095]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified potent antimalarial activity in natural isocoumarins and their semisynthetic derivatives. Compound 1n was found to inhibit hemozoin polymerization, decrease mitochondrial membrane potential, and inhibit P. falciparum DNA gyrase, making it a promising candidate for further drug development.
In this study, eight natural isocoumarins (1-8) were isolated from a marinederived Exserohilum sp. fungus. To explore their structure-activity relationship and discover potent antimalarial leads, a small library of 22 new derivatives (1a-1n, 2a, 3a-3c, 4a-4c, and 7a) were semisynthesized by varying the substituents of the aromatic ring and the aliphatic side chains. The natural compound (1) and three semisynthetic derivatives (1d, 1n, and 2a), possessing an all-cis stereochemistry, exhibited strong antiplasmodial activity with IC50 values of 1.1, 0.8, 0.4, and 2.6 mu M, respectively. Mechanism studies show that 1n inhibits hemozoin polymerization and decreases the mitochondrial membrane potential but also inhibits P. falciparum DNA gyrase. 1n not only combines different mechanisms of action but also exhibits a high therapeutic index (CC50/IC50 = 675), high selectivity, and a notable drug-like profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据