4.7 Article

Combining experiment and density functional theory to study the mechanism of thermochemical sulfate reduction by hydrogen in supercritical water

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115654

关键词

Thermochemical sulfate reduction; DFT; Supercritical water; Solvation effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the mechanism of thermochemical sulfate reduction under supercritical water gasification conditions, revealing that higher sulfate reduction extent was achieved under acidic conditions.
Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) is famous for converting and utilizing sulfur-containing fuels without SOx emission. Under the hydrogen-rich reductive condition, sulfide is the prevalent inorganic existence form of sulfur with the presence of oxidative sulfurous compounds which is represented by sulfate. The transformation between sulfate and sulfide is of interest to realize regulating the final products. Thus, experimental and theoretical studies were applied in the presentwork to explore the unknownmechanism of thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) by H-2. The degree of sulfate reduction by hydrogen decreases from 63 +/- 5% of NaHSO4 to 24 +/- 3% of Na2SO4, and 18 +/- 1% of Na2SO4_K2SO4_NaOH mixture at the same reaction condition (600 degrees C, 25MPa, 20min). Sulfide, which presents in both liquid and gas phase, is the only reduction product, without any apparition of thiosulfate or SOx. Using SMD implicit continuum solvation model, the effect of supercritical water (SCW) on the reaction paths was detailed discussed in the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The absence of SO2 in SCWG is a result of the solvation effect which guarantees the spontaneity of the consumption reaction of SO2. By comparing Gibbs free energy change and energy barrier of each reaction, the experimental results that higher sulfate reduction extentwas reached under acidic conditionwas justified. The experimental and theoretical results are in good agreement with each other. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据