4.7 Article

Solubility, dissolution thermodynamics and preferential solvation of sulfadiazine in (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone plus water) mixtures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115693

关键词

Sulfadiazine; {NMP (1) + water (2)} mixtures; Cosolvency; Dissolution thermodynamics; Jouyban-Acree model; Preferential solvation; IKBI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solubility of sulfadiazine in {N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) + water} mixtures was determined and correlated using the Jouyban-Acree model from 278.15 K to 313.15 K. Discontinuous solubility trends were observed in NMP-rich mixtures at low temperatures. Enthalpy-entropy relationships were found to be non-linear, with sulfadiazine preferentially solvated by water molecules in water-rich mixtures and NMP molecules in mixtures 0.17 < x(1) < 1.00 at 313.15 K.
Solubility of sulfadiazine in {N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) + water} mixtures from 278.15 K to 313.15 K has been determined and correlated by means of the Jouyban-Acree model. Discontinuous solubility trends are observed in NMP-rich mixtures at low temperatures. By using the van't Hoff and Gibbs equations the respective apparent thermodynamic quantities for the dissolution and mixing processes, namely Gibbs energy, enthalpy, and entropy, were calculated. Non-linear enthalpy-entropy relationships were observed in the plot of enthalpy vs. Gibbs energy exhibiting negative but variant slopes in the composition region 0.00 < w(1) < 0.60 and variant negative and positive slopes in the other mixtures for the first case. Otherwise, a variant negative slope from neat water to w(1) = 0.80 but a positive slope from this mixture to neat NMP were observed for the second case. Based on the inverse Kirkwood-Buff integrals it follows that sulfadiazine is preferentially solvated by water molecules in water-rich mixtures but preferentially solvated by NMP molecules in mixtures 0.17 < x(1) < 1.00 at 313.15 K. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据