4.7 Article

ANuPP: A Versatile Tool to Predict Aggregation Nucleating Regions in Peptides and Proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 433, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.11.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of human resource and development (MHRD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on predicting aggregation-nucleating regions in peptides and proteins, developing an effective tool ANuPP. By analyzing atomic-level features, a better understanding of the aggregation mechanism is gained, providing important insights for protein aggregation research.
Short aggregation prone sequence motifs can trigger aggregation in peptide and protein sequences. Most algorithms developed so far to identify potential aggregation prone regions (APRs) use amino acid residue composition and/or sequence pattern features. In this work, we have investigated the importance of atomic-level characteristics rather than residue level to understand the initiation of aggregation in proteins and peptides. Using atomic-level features an ensemble-classifier, ANuPP has been developed to predict the aggregation-nucleating regions in peptides and proteins. In a dataset of 1279 hexapeptides, ANuPP achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 with 77% accuracy on 10-fold cross-validation and an AUC of 0.883 with 83% accuracy in a blind test dataset of 142 hexapeptides. Further, it showed an average SOV of 48.7% on identifying APR regions in 37 proteins. The performance of ANuPP is better than other methods reported in the literature on both amyloidogenic hexapeptide prediction and APR identification. We have developed a web server for ANuPP and it is available at https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/ANuPP/. Insights gained from this work demonstrate the importance of atomic and functional group characteristics towards diversity of atomic level origins as well as mechanisms of protein aggregation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据