4.7 Article

Engineered Conotoxin Differentially Blocks and Discriminates Rat and Human α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 9, 页码 5620-5631

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02079

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872794, 41966003]
  2. Major Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province [ZDKJ2016002]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP150103990, LE160100218, CE200100012]
  4. Australian Research Council [LE160100218] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified that amidated [Q1G, Delta R14]LvIB is a potent blocker of rat alpha 7 nAChRs and can differentiate between human and rat alpha 7 nAChRs. Substitutions at key mutation sites between rat and human alpha 7 nAChRs revealed that the combined influence of Gln141, Asn184, and Lys186 determines the alpha 7 nAChR species specificity of this peptide.
The alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is present in the central nervous system and plays an important role in cognitive function and memory. alpha-Conotoxin LvIB, identified from genomic DNA of Conus lividus, its three isomers and four globular isomer analogues were synthesized and screened at a wide range of nAChR subtypes. One of the analogues, amidated [Q1G, Delta R14]LvIB, was found to be a potent blocker of rat alpha 7 nAChRs. Importantly, it differentiates between alpha 7 nAChRs of human (IC50: 1570 nM) and rat (IC50: 97 nM). Substitutions between rat and human alpha 7 nAChRs at three key mutation sites revealed that no single mutant could completely change the activity profile of amidated [Q1G, Delta R14]LvIB. Rather, we found that the combined influence of Gln141, Asn184, and Lys186 determines the alpha 7 nAChR species specificity of this peptide. This engineered alpha 4/4 conotoxin has potential applications as a template for designing ligands to selectively block human alpha 7 nAChRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据