4.2 Article

NONLOCAL CONTINUUM ADAPTIVE ELASTIC BONE-COLUMN BUCKLING MODEL

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0219519421500159

关键词

Nonlocal continuum mechanics; adaptive elasticity; bone density gradient; beam buckling theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stability-initiated failure dominates in bone, especially in older bone, due to the instability of single trabeculae which is prone to inelastic buckling. The goal of this study is to improve the mechanistic understanding of bone buckling failure, with a simplified adaptive-beam buckling model formulated within the context of nonlocal adaptive continuum mechanics. Controlled buckling tests of single trabeculae from three medial tibia end sections were conducted for comparison with the response of the simplified model.
It is well argued that stability-initiated failure dominates, especially in older bone, because of the instability of single trabeculae which is prone to inelastic buckling at stresses far less than expected for strength-based failure. It is also well known that when several horizontal struts have disappeared, trabecula fails due to compression-buckling load. In this contribution, our main goal is to improve, from theoretical point of view, the mechanistic understanding of bone buckling failure which is known to be at the core of important clinical problems. For that and with respect to previous works, an attempt is made in order to establish a simplified adaptive-beam buckling model, formulated within the context of the nonlocal adaptive continuum mechanics, from which numerical computations were performed in order to get a better knowledge about bone-column buckling mechanism affected by both bone density and bone density gradient distributions restricted to Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. An attempt is made to compare the experimental data with the response of our simplified model. For that, controlled buckling tests of single trabeculae were carried out from three medial tibia end sections (knee joint).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据