相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals
Richard D. Morey et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2016)
Best (but oft forgotten) practices: testing for treatment effects in randomized trials by separate analyses of changes from baseline in each group is a misleading approach
J. Martin Bland et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION (2015)
How to test hypotheses if you must
Andrew P. Grieve
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2015)
Good practices for quantitative bias analysis
Timothy L. Lash et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Trap of trends to statistical significance: likelihood of near significant P value becoming more significant with extra data
John Wood et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
Matthew J. Page et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2014)
Testosterone therapy and cardiovascular events among men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials
Lin Xu et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2013)
Living with Statistics in Observational Research
Sander Greenland et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Living with P Values Resurrecting a Bayesian Perspective on Frequentist Statistics
Sander Greenland et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
P Values and Statistical Practice
Andrew Gelman
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias - An Updated Review
Kerry Dwan et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Nonsignificance Plus High Power Does Not Imply Support for the Null Over the Alternative
Sander Greenland
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Bad statistical practice in pharmacology (and other basic biomedical disciplines): you probably don't know P
Michael J. Lew
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY (2012)
Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review
Benoit You et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2012)
Transparency and disclosure, neutrality and balance: shared values or just shared words?
Sander Greenland
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2012)
Significance tests as sorcery: Science is empirical-significance tests are not
Charles Lambdin
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2012)
Null misinterpretation in statistical testing and its impact on health risk assessment
Sander Greenland
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2011)
Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials
Dirk Eyding et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
Final collapse of the Neyman-Pearson decision theoretic framework and rise of the neoFisherian
Stuart H. Hurlbert et al.
ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI (2009)
Accounting for uncertainty about investigator bias: disclosure is informative: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?
Sander Greenland
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2009)
Translating statistical findings into plain English
Stuart J. Pocock et al.
LANCET (2009)
A dirty dozen:: Twelve P-value misconceptions
Steven Goodman
SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY (2008)
A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2007)
Oral contraception and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma
Shail Maheshwari et al.
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY (2007)
Probability as certainty:: Dichotomous thinking and the misuse of p values
Rink Hoekstra et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2006)
The difference between significant and not significant is not itself statistically significant
Andrew Gelman et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2006)
Severe testing as a basic concept in a Neyman-Pearson philosophy of induction
Deborah G. Mayo et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2006)
Introduction to Bayesian methods I: measuring the strength of evidence
SN Goodman
CLINICAL TRIALS (2005)
Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of null hypothesis significance tests
MP Lecoutre et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2003)
Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studies
SJ Senn
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2002)
A comment on replication, p-values and evidence
S Senn
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses
T Sellke et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2001)
The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis
JM Hoenig et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2001)
Sifting the evidence - what's wrong with significance tests?
JAC Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)
分享论文
