4.6 Article

Are activated carbon pore structure parameters linearly positively related to its mass-specific capacitance?

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 21, 页码 12336-12349

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-06106-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Promotion Project of China [2020133136]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFE0201800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilizes apricot shell lignin to prepare activated carbon and finds that in the low current density range, the micropore surface area density of activated carbon is linearly positively related to its mass-specific capacitance, serving as a universal predictor for mass-specific capacitance.
Despite considerable achievements in the use of porous carbon in electrochemical double-layer capacitor or electrode of supercapacitor over the past few years, understanding the relationship between pore structure parameters and electrochemical performance has long been highly desirable. Herein, apricot shell lignin (ASL) was used to prepare activated carbon, after which the galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) test was performed. Meanwhile, the pore structure parameters of AAC were determined by the nitrogen adsorption-desorption test. The results confirmed that the AAC pore structure parameters were consistent with the inherent law of activation. Besides, in the low current density ranging from 0.50 A/g to 10.00 A/g, the micropore surface area density of AAC rather than other pore structure parameters (e.g., mesoporosity, micropore specific surface area, mesopore specific surface area) was linearly positively related to its mass-specific capacitance. Additionally, the average of linear fit coefficients between micropore surface area density and mass-specific capacitance was 0.92. Consequently, when using a three- electrode configuration with a 6 M KOH electrolyte, the micropore surface area density of activated carbon can be employed as a universal predictor of mass-specific capacitance in a low current density range 0.50-10.00 A/g.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据