4.5 Article

The effect of silk-gelatin bioink and TGF-β3 on mesenchymal stromal cells in 3D bioprinted chondrogenic constructs: A proteomic study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 19, 页码 4051-4067

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43578-021-00230-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, India
  2. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation
  3. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli funds: 5 per mille and ricerca corrente

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One major limitation of 3D bioprinting is the lack of understanding of the role of bioink in modulating molecular signaling pathways. The interaction between SF-G bioink and hMSCs enhanced several chondrogenic pathways, providing potential for further research in this area. This study represents the first detailed proteomics analysis to identify articular cartilage-specific pathways in SF-G-based 3D bioprinted constructs.
Major limitation of 3D bioprinting is the poor understanding of the role of bioink in modulating molecular signaling pathways. Phenotypically stable engineered articular cartilage was fabricated using silk fibroin-gelatin (SF-G) bioink and progenitor cells or mature articular chondrocytes. In the current study, role of SF-G bioink in modulating in vitro chondrogenic signaling pathways in human bone marrow-derived stromal cells (hMSCs) is elucidated. The interaction between SF-G bioink and hMSCs augmented several chondrogenic pathways, including Wnt, HIF-1, and Notch. We explored the debatable role of TGF-beta signaling, by assessing the differential protein expression by hMSCs-laden bioprinted constructs in the presence and absence of TGF-beta 3. hMSCs-laden bioprinted constructs contained a large percentage of collagen type II and Filamin-B, typical to the native articular cartilage. Hypertrophy markers were not identified following TGF-beta 3 addition. This is first detailed proteomics analysis to identify articular cartilage-specific pathways in SF-G-based 3D bioprinted construct.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据