4.6 Article

Flammability Assessment of GluBam with Cone-Calorimeter Tests

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003670

关键词

Bamboo; Glubam; Cone calorimeter; Time to ignition; Heat release rate; Smoke production rate

资金

  1. MOE Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency at Hunan University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50938002, 51378200]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team Project [IRT0619]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study conducted experiments on the combustion behaviors of glue-laminated bamboo boards and found that glubam generally performs better than plywood. Comparison with other studies suggests that glubam is less flammable than laminated bamboo materials and several wood species, indicating its potential as a substitute for untreated plywood in structural and lining applications.
Bamboo is increasingly recognized for its potential as an environmentally friendly and sustainable building material, but the knowledge of its combustion properties and the safety of bamboo building construction are very limited. In this study, experiments were conducted to obtain the combustion behaviors of glue-laminated bamboo (GluBam or glubam) boards by using a cone calorimeter. The tests were carried out at five levels of heat flux: 15, 25, 35, 50, and 70 kW/m(2). The measured results are compared with those of fir plywood. Glubam generally behaves better than plywood under the same heat flux. A further comparison of the investigation in this study with some measured results in published papers indicates that glubam is less flammable than the laminated bamboo materials and several wood species. The fire safety assessment of glubam is also studied based on fire hazard indices, the charring rate, and fire endurance time. From flammability considerations, glubam has the potential as a substitute for untreated plywood in structural and lining applications and should further be evaluated according to building codes to define its end-use. (c) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据