4.6 Article

Smoking, physical exercise, BMI and late foetal death: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 999-1009

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-016-0190-2

关键词

Cohort study; Danish National Birth Cohort; Pregnancy; Mother/father's smoking; Foetal programming; Foetal death

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. Pharmacy Foundation
  3. Egmont Foundation
  4. March of the Dimes Birth Defects Foundation
  5. Augustinus Foundation
  6. Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper was to estimate the effect of maternal and paternal smoking on foetal death (miscarriage and stillbirth) and to estimate potential interactions with physical exercise and pre-pregnancy body mass index. We selected 87,930 pregnancies from the population-based Danish National Birth Cohort. Information about lifestyle, occupational, medical and obstetric factors was obtained from a telephone interview and data on pregnancy outcomes came from the Danish population based registries. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (adjusted for potential confounders) for predominantly late foetal death (miscarriage and stillbirth). An interaction contrast ratio was used to assess potential effect measure modification of smoking by physical exercise and body mass index. The adjusted hazard ratio of foetal death was 1.22 (95 % CI 1.02-1.46) for couples where both parents smoked compared to non-smoking parents (miscarriage: 1.18, 95 % CI 0.96-1.44; stillbirth: 1.32, 95 % CI 0.93-1.89). On the additive scale, we detected a small positive interaction for stillbirth between smoking and body mass index (overweight women). In conclusion, smoking during pregnancy was associated with a slightly higher hazard ratio for foetal death if both parents smoked. This study suggests that smoking may increase the negative effect of a high BMI on foetal death, but results were not statistically significant for the interaction between smoking and physical exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据