4.5 Article

Fatigue Assessment of 2024-T351 Aluminum Alloy Under Uniaxial Cyclic Loading

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-021-05613-7

关键词

fatigue life; Manson– Coffin– Basquin equation; pattern recognition; plastic strain energy; surface damage

资金

  1. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program (Talent-Introduction Program) of the People's Republic of China [234384]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the fatigue life of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy through experimental and numerical methods. Mechanical properties were obtained through tensile testing, and the Manson-Coffin-Basquin equation was used to estimate fatigue life. Observing changes in the ratio of white to black pixels on the specimen surface indicated a relationship between material fatigue and specimen surface.
In this paper, an experimental and numerical study of the fatigue life of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy has been investigated. For this purpose, mechanical properties of the material are obtained by tensile test. The Manson-Coffin-Basquin equation is used to estimate the fatigue life. The specimen surface is photographed using a microscope camera to examine the specimen deformation. The ratio of white to black pixels on the specimen surface that changes during loading is investigated using the image processing method. Changes in the ratio of white to black pixels indicate that material fatigue is associated with the specimen surface. The experiments are strain-controlled and in 6 different strain amplitudes on the specimens. Then, by obtaining the amplitude range of elastic and plastic strains in the stress-strain hysteresis loop, the coefficients of the Manson-Coffin-Basquin equation are calculated in a stable cycle. Using these coefficients, the Manson-Coffin-Basquin equation is presented to estimate the fatigue life of the material in an amplitude of different strains. A comparison of the results of this equation and the experimental results show a good agreement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据