4.7 Article

Blockchain-based application for the traceability of complex assembly structures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 617-630

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.04.013

关键词

Traceability; dApp; Blockchain; ERC 1155; Assembly; Smart manufacturing; Graph model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Production processes are becoming increasingly complex and decentralized, posing challenges for the development of traceability systems. While some solutions exist, customized and volatile industries lack appropriate models and proofs of concept.
Production processes are becoming increasingly complex and decentralized, spanning across multiple manufacturing areas, factories, and even countries. Thereby is the development of a holistic and data-continuous traceability system, which provides transparency of records for the entire manufacturing flow from raw materials to the final product, one of the main challenges. While some solutions already address traceability issues in supply chain management and manufacturing, customized and volatile industries, in which each product features a unique configuration, are still lacking appropriate models and proofs of concept. In this research, we develop a decentralized blockchain application called TokenTrail, which focuses on the specific traceability requirements of multi-hierarchical assembly structures. The proposed blockchain architecture is based on a consortium Ethereum network and a Proof of Authority consensus, which delivers a trusted and shared database within an economic processing framework. To overcome the challenges of managing liaison transformations, we develop an assembly token manager based on the semi-fungible ERC 1155 token, which enables a direct representation of complex assembly processes and structures containing unique parts and batches within one smart contract. A user-friendly front-end application simplifies the querying of the recorded traceability data and visualizes existing dependencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据