4.7 Article

Image Quality Assessment of Fetal Brain MRI Using Multi-Instance Deep Learning Methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 818-829

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27649

关键词

fetal brain MRI; image quality assessment; deep learning; multi‐ instance learning; weakly supervised learning

资金

  1. NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL116585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to automatically assess the quality of 3D fetal brain MR images using multi-instance deep learning methods. The MI-CB-DLM performed better than other DLMs, and including fetal gestational age as an input improved its performance. MI-CB-DLM may potentially be used to objectively and rapidly assess fetal MR image quality.
Background Due to random motion of fetuses and maternal respirations, image quality of fetal brain MRIs varies considerably. To address this issue, visual inspection of the images is performed during acquisition phase and after 3D-reconstruction, and the images are re-acquired if they are deemed to be of insufficient quality. However, this process is time-consuming and subjective. Multi-instance (MI) deep learning methods (DLMs) may perform this task automatically. Purpose To propose an MI count-based DLM (MI-CB-DLM), an MI vote-based DLM (MI-VB-DLM), and an MI feature-embedding DLM (MI-FE-DLM) for automatic assessment of 3D fetal-brain MR image quality. To quantify influence of fetal gestational age (GA) on DLM performance. Study type Retrospective. Subjects Two hundred and seventy-one MR exams from 211 fetuses (mean GA +/- SD = 30.9 +/- 5.5 weeks). Field Strength/Sequence T-2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo acquired at 1.5 T. Assessment The T-2-weighted images were reconstructed in 3D. Then, two fetal neuroradiologists, a clinical neuroscientist, and a fetal MRI technician independently labeled the reconstructed images as 1 or 0 based on image quality (1 = high; 0 = low). These labels were fused and served as ground truth. The proposed DLMs were trained and evaluated using three repeated 10-fold cross-validations (training and validation sets of 244 and 27 scans). To quantify GA influence, this variable was included as an input of the DLMs. Statistical Tests DLM performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F-score, accuracy, and AUC values. Results Precision, recall, F-score, accuracy, and AUC averaged over the three cross validations were 0.85 +/- 0.01, 0.85 +/- 0.01, 0.85 +/- 0.01, 0.85 +/- 0.01, 0.93 +/- 0.01, for MI-CB-DLM (without GA); 0.75 +/- 0.03, 0.75 +/- 0.03, 0.75 +/- 0.03, 0.75 +/- 0.03, 0.81 +/- 0.03, for MI-VB-DLM (without GA); 0.81 +/- 0.01, 0.81 +/- 0.01, 0.81 +/- 0.01, 0.81 +/- 0.01, 0.89 +/- 0.01, for MI-FE-DLM (without GA); and 0.86 +/- 0.01, 0.86 +/- 0.01, 0.86 +/- 0.01, 0.86 +/- 0.01, 0.93 +/- 0.01, for MI-CB-DLM with GA. Data Conclusion MI-CB-DLM performed better than other DLMs. Including GA as an input of MI-CB-DLM improved its performance. MI-CB-DLM may potentially be used to objectively and rapidly assess fetal MR image quality. Evidence Level 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 3

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据