4.1 Article

Robotic LINX Placement: Is It Worth It?

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0103

关键词

GERD; hiatal hernia repair; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery; magnetic sphincter augmentation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared robotic and laparoscopic approaches to LINX device placement, finding that robotic LINX procedures did not offer superior outcomes in terms of postoperative PPI use, dysphagia, or hospital length of stay. Patients undergoing robotic surgery had longer operative time and higher overall charges compared to laparoscopic LINX procedures.
Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is considered the current gold standard of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the LINX(R) device was developed as a less technically challenging alternative that has proven to be a safe and effective surgical antireflux procedure. Despite rapid adoption of the robotic platform in many areas of general surgery, no studies have compared laparoscopic and robotic approaches to placement of the LINX device. This retrospective study is the first to compare the robotic platform with the laparoscopic approach for minimally invasive LINX placement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a total cohort of 20 patients who underwent LINX placement with hiatal hernia repair at our institution. Half of the patients underwent surgery using laparoscopy and the other half with robotic technology. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and charge differences were analyzed. Results: We found that there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, surgical outcomes, use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) postoperatively, or postoperative dysphagia. Patients undergoing robotic surgery had longer operative time (139 +/- 25 minutes versus 81 +/- 14 minutes, P < .01), higher intraoperative charges ($8980 +/- 275 versus $7239 +/- 355, P < .01), and higher charges associated with their hospital stay ($45,037 +/- 4112.41 versus $39,565 +/- 3731.64, P < .01). Conclusions: In comparison with laparoscopic LINX procedures, robotic LINX does not offer superior surgical outcomes in terms of postoperative PPI use, dysphagia, or hospital length of stay. Robotic LINX procedures are associated with increased operative time and overall charges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据