4.7 Article

Autoantibodies to DSC3 in Pemphigus Exclusively Recognize Calcium-Dependent Epitope in Extracellular Domain 2

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 141, 期 9, 页码 2123-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.01.032

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Dermatological Association Basic Medical Research Grant - Shiseido (2017),
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K08762]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the characteristics of anti-DSC3 antibodies in Pemphigus patients, revealing a predominant recognition of a calcium-dependent epitope in the EC2 domain of DSC3 by these antibodies, and their pathogenicity on keratinocyte adhesion through DSC3 depletion.
Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune bullous diseases characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against adhesion molecules, desmogleins, and desmocollins (DSCs). The pathogenicity of anti-DSC3 antibodies in pemphigus has been demonstrated; however, its characteristics have not yet been elucidated. We aimed to analyze the characteristics of anti-DSC3 antibodies using DSC3 domain-swapped desmoglein 2 molecules in which the prosequence and five extracellular (EC) domains of desmoglein 2 were replaced with the corresponding domains of human DSC3. Using these proteins, we established an ELISA and analyzed sera from 56 patients with pemphigus. In 34 pemphigus sera positive for DSC3 full-EC domains, 15 sera (44.1%) were positive for EC2 domain, whereas other domains were rarely positive. We assessed the reactivity to a calcium-dependent epitope in DSC3 by ELISA with EDTA. The reactivity with the EC2 domain was mostly compromised in the presence of EDTA. In the in vitro assay, IgG from patients with paraneoplastic pemphigus pre-adsorbed with EC2 prevented both reduction of DSC3 and keratinocyte dissociation as compared with that with EDTA-treated EC2. This study revealed a predominant recognition of calcium-dependent epitopes in EC2 domain by anti-DSC3 antibodies and its pathogenicity on keratinocyte adhesion through DSC3 depletion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据