期刊
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 282-290出版社
ESMON PUBLICIDAD S A, DEPT ALLERGY & CLIN IMMUNOL, CLIN UNIV NAVARRA
DOI: 10.18176/jiaci.0698
关键词
Anaphylaxis; Anaphylactic shock; Cofactor; Food allergy
资金
- Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER [RD16/0006/0001, RD16/0006/0007]
- Program Rio Hortega [CM19/00046]
- Societat Catalana d'Al.lergia I Immunologia Clinica (SCAIC)-Allergy Therapeutics [PI16/00696, P19/01861]
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
The study aimed to identify risk factors in patients who experience anaphylactic shock. Using lipid transfer protein (LTP) allergy as a model, the characteristics of patients who developed anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock were compared. The results showed that patients in the anaphylaxis group experienced more reactions than those in the anaphylactic shock group. There was no relationship between different food groups and the severity of the reaction. The most frequent food involved in both groups was a combination of several plant-derived foods. Anaphylactic shock seems to be associated with other individual-related factors requiring further evaluation.
Background: The prevalence of anaphylactic shock, the most severe manifestation of anaphylaxis, remains unknown. Risk factors and biomarkers have not been fully identified. Objective: To identify risk factors in patients who experience anaphylactic shock. Methods: Using lipid transfer protein (LTP) allergy as a model, we compared the characteristics of patients who developed anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. We recorded demographics, pollen sensitization, foods ingested up to 2 hours before onset of the reaction, and the presence of cofactors. Culprit foods were identified through a compatible clinical history and positive allergology work-up (skin prick test and/or sIgE). Results: We evaluated 150 reactions in 55 patients with anaphylaxis (134 reactions) and 12 with anaphylactic shock (16 reactions). Patients in the anaphylaxis group experienced twice as many reactions (mean [SD], 2.4 [2.5] for anaphylaxis vs 1.3 [1.5] for anaphylactic shock; P<. 02). No relationship was found between any food group and severity of the reaction. The most frequent food involved in both groups of patients was the combination of several plant-derived foods (plant food mix), followed by peach and nuts. Indeed, in the reactions caused by plant food mix, the presence of a cofactor was observed more often than in other food groups. On the other hand, cofactors were not present in peach- and nut-related reactions. Exercise was the most frequent cofactor in all groups. Conclusion: In our series, the severity of the reactions was not determined by the kind of food or presence of a cofactor. Anaphylactic shock seems to be an infrequent presentation that may be associated with other individual-related factors requiring further evaluation.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据