4.4 Article

Electromechanical modelling of piezoelectrically actuated MEMS tunable lenses with geometric nonlinearity

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1045389X211006911

关键词

Geometric nonlinearity; piezoelectric plates; MEMS; tunable micro-lenses; residual stress

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [235210]
  2. Norwegian Metacenter for High Performance Computing (NOTUR) [NN9344K]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a variational model for the geometrically nonlinear behavior of piezoelectrically actuated MEMS tunable lenses, addressing softening and hardening effects exhibited by the lens during operation. By solving a cubic nonlinear system of equations, the model accurately predicts lens displacement, showing good agreement with FEM simulations and experimental measurements.
This article presents a variational model for the geometrically nonlinear behaviour of the piezoelectrically actuated MEMS tunable lenses. Residual stresses during fabrication and larger actuation voltages cause large deflections such that a linear model would provide less accurate approximation. This presses the need for a nonlinear model that can explain the softening and hardening effects exhibited by the lens during its operation and affect its optical performance. Thus, in the view of von Karman's plate theory, the presented nonlinear model predicts the lens displacement after solving a cubic nonlinear system of equations. The chosen displacement ansatz fits the problem under study by satisfying the mechanical boundary conditions, and simplifying calculation of the variational integrals and optical representation of the lens' sag. The model also shows good agreement with FEM simulations over various combinations of tensile and compressive residual stresses. Moreover, it succeeds in fitting measurements when used in a constrained optimization scheme in which the layers' residual stresses and the e-form piezoelectric coupling coefficient are the fitting parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据