4.8 Article

The Chinese Society of Hepatology position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 454-461

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.003

关键词

MAFLD; NAFLD; voting; Consensus; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatty liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction is a growing concern in China with the highest incidence rate compared to European countries and the US. The proposal to change the name from NAFLD to MAFLD has received strong support in China, and it is expected to improve healthcare for patients and advance disease awareness, public health policy, and other outcomes related to MAFLD.
Fatty liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction is of increasing concern in mainland China, the world's most populous country. The incidence of fatty liver disease is highest in China, surpassing the incidence in European countries and the USA. An international consensus panel recently published an influential report recommending a novel definition of fatty liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction. This recommendation includes a switch in name from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and adoption of a set of positive criteria for disease diagnosis that are independent of alcohol intake or other liver diseases. Given the unique importance of this proposal, the Chinese Society of Hepatology (CSH) invited leading hepatologists and gastroenterologists representing their respective provinces and cities to reach consensus on alternative definitions for fatty liver disease from a national perspective. The CSH endorses the proposed change from NAFLD to MAFLD (supported by 95.45% of participants). We expect that the new definition will result in substantial improvements in health care for patients and advance disease awareness, public health policy, and political, scientific and funding outcomes for MAFLD in China. (C) 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据