4.7 Article

An insight into the interaction between malachite green oxalate with human serum albumin: Molecular dynamic simulation and spectroscopic approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 407, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124878

关键词

Malachite green oxalate; Human serum albumin; Binding interaction; Molecular dynamic simulation; Multi-spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the molecular interaction between malachite green oxalate and human serum albumin using a combination of molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulation, and multi-spectroscopic approaches. The results showed a stable interaction between MGO and HSA, leading to structural changes in the protein.
Cationic triarylmethane dyes such as malachite green are aromatic xenobiotic compounds causing environmental pollution. The affinity between hazardous materials and biomolecules makes it important to understand the properties of such compounds. Accordingly, in this study, the possible molecular interaction between this pollutant and the human serum albumin (HSA) was investigated using a combination of molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulation and multi-spectroscopic approaches. The docking results illustrated that malachite green oxalate (MGO) could bind to some of the HSA amino acids with the estimated free energy = -32.93 kJ/mol. Further, the results of the dynamic simulation revealed that MGO had a steady interaction with the protein though increasing flexibility and decreasing the HSA compactness. These results were, therefore, in agreement with those obtained by spectroscopic techniques. The MGO concentration of 0.0005 mM could quench the HSA's intrinsic fluorescence by %16.88. The protein structural changes also revealed that the binding interaction of MGO-HSA was accompanied by an increase in the alpha-helix and a decrease in the beta-sheet of the protein. Overall, this study indicated the suitable molecular modeling interaction of MGO and HSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据