4.7 Review

Non-biodegradable microplastics in soils: A brief review and challenge

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 409, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124525

关键词

Microplastic; Distribution; Biological effect; Toxicity; Decomposition; Analytical method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771313]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through a quantitative summary of 170 publications on non-biodegradable microplastics in soils, it was found that most studies were conducted in agricultural soils in Asia and Europe, with polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene particles being the most frequently found, predominantly in the size range of 20-5000 micrometers.
Non-biodegradable microplastics (MPs) pollution long-termly existed in soils, and was only concerned in recent years. In order to better understand MP behavior in soils, the sources, migration, distribution, biological effects, degradation and analytical methodology of non-biodegradable MPs in soils were quantificationally summarized from 170 publications based on Web of Science in 1950-2020. From the publications, we found these studies were mainly carried out in the Asia (60.0%) and Europe (23.3%), and most were on agricultural soils (68.5%). Polyethylene-MP (78.8% of the studies), Polypropylene-MP (78.8%), and Polystyrene-MP (45.5%) were the MPs most frequently found in the soils, with a MP size of 20-5000 mu m being most common. Of the soil samples 64.3% contained MP 1000-4000 items kg(-1), and the colour frequency ranking is blue (66.7%) > white (61.1%) approximate to red approximate to black. MPs changed the soil microenvironment and microorganism activity, and caused the negative effects on both soil animals (100%) and plants (57.9%). MP degradation was influenced by the photooxidation reactions, microorganism activities, enzymatic effects, environmental conditions, and by the composition, size and morphology of the MPs. An optional analytical method was suggested in this study. At the end of paper, the urgent and important research work in the future was prospected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据