4.5 Article

Evaluation of microbiological safety, physicochemical and aromatic qualities of shiikuwasha (Citrus depressa Hayata) juice after high pressure processing

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-021-05103-7

关键词

Shiikuwasha; Juice; Pasteurization; High-pressure processing; Aroma

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China [MOST 109-2622-E-150 -010 -CC2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that high pressure processing at 600 MPa for 150 s can effectively reduce Escherichia coli O157:H7 and maintain the quality of shiikuwasha juice, while HTST treatment results in loss of antioxidant content and negative impact on juice color.
This study evaluated high pressure processing (HPP) for achieving greater than 5-log reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in shiikuwasha (Citrus depressa Hayata) juices and compare quality parameters, including microbiological safety, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavanones (TFC), and polymethoxylated flavones, browning, volatile aromatic, and physicochemical properties of HPP-treated juice with those of high-temperature short-time pasteurized juice. A HPP of 600 MPa for 150 s was identified capable of achieving greater than 5.15-log reductions of E. coli O157:H7 in shiikuwasha juice. The microbiological shelf life of the juices were at least 28 days when processed at HPP for 600 MPa/150 s or HTST for 90 degrees C/60 s. The color, aromatic, and antioxidant contents (TPC, TFC, Tangeletin, Nobiletin) were well preserved after HPP, however, HTST resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) loss of antioxidant content (TPC (8.8%), Tangeletin (6.8%)), and negatively impacted the juice color. By the end of storage, the amount of these aroma relevant volatiles appears to still be higher in HPP pasteurized juices compared to their conventional counterparts. This study demonstrated that under optimal conditions of HPP can attain the same level of microbiological safety as thermal pasteurization and preserved the acceptable quality of shiikuwasha juice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据