4.4 Article

Detecting melamine-adulterated raw milk by using near-infrared transmission spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.13685

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671935]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated that through the use of near-infrared transmission spectroscopy, it is possible to identify raw milk with melamine contents exceeding the 1 mg/kg limit, providing technical support and effective information for the development of portable instruments for on-site detection of melamine-adulterated raw milk.
Chinese national standards regulate that the melamine in infant food should not exceed 1 mg/kg. To quickly and accurately identify whether the melamine in raw milk exceeds the limit, near-infrared transmission (NIRT) spectra of 220 raw milk samples and 380 melamine-adulterated raw milk samples were collected over the spectral range of 900-1,700 nm. Different spectral preprocessing and dimension reduction methods were used to preprocess the data of full spectra with 425 wavelengths. The qualitative prediction models of partial least squares discriminate analysis (PLS-DA) and support vector machine (SVM) were built based on full spectra and reduced data. The results showed that the SVM was better than PLS-DA in identifying the melamine-adulterated raw milk whose melamine contents exceeded the limit of 1 mg/kg. The established SVM model using full spectra had the optimal prediction performance with the accuracy rate of 92.67%, sensitivity of 89.09%, and specificity of 94.74%. The study indicates that the raw milk whose melamine contents exceed the limit of 1 mg/kg could be identified by using NIRT spectroscopy. Practical Applications This study demonstrated that the raw milk whose melamine contents exceed the limit of 1 mg/kg could be identified by using near-infrared transmission spectroscopy. The results provide technical support and effective information for developing portable instrument to detect melamine-adulterated raw milk in situ or in field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据