4.7 Article

Wettability of gelatin-based films: The effects of hydrophilic or hydrophobic plasticizers and nanoparticle loads

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110480

关键词

Edible films; Glycerol; Acetyl tributyl citrate; Montmorillonite; Water contact angle; Surface tension

资金

  1. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/07914-81, 2019/26348-0]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [30.0799/2013-6]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion del Peru
  4. program Programa Nacional de Becas y Credito Educativo (PRONABEC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of different plasticizers on the surface properties of gelatin-based films were studied, where the glycerol plasticized film showed the smoothest surface and the MMT-loaded film exhibited the greatest surface roughness. All films showed a hydrophobic character, with WCA values correlating with wettability trends.
The effects on surface properties of films with compositions based on gelatin plasticized with glycerol, without or with montmorillonite (MMT), and plasticized with acetyl tributyl citrate (ATC) was investigated. The water contact angle (WCA), wettability and free surface energy were determined by measuring the WCA using the sessile drop method. The surface topography was measured by AFM. The film plasticized by glycerol presented the smoothest surface, while the film loaded with MMT presented the greatest surface roughness followed by that plasticized by ATC. All films showed a hydrophobic character (WCA>65 degrees), and the same trend was observed for wettability. It is worth mentioning that there was no significant correlation between the values of WAC and roughness. The films showed low polar component values, which corroborate the high WCA values obtained. In conclusion, the MMT load or the use of ATC did not expressively improve the humidity resistance of films based on gelatin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据