4.2 Review

Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems Metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1403-1416

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jep.13582

关键词

electronic health records; electronic patients record (EPR); systematic review; usability methods; usability metrics

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT-103703/Z/14/Z]
  2. Biomedical Research Centre
  3. National Institute for Health Research
  4. Department of Health
  5. Department of Health Social Care
  6. Health Innovation Challenge Fund [HICF-R9-524]
  7. University of Oxford
  8. Wellcome Trust [103703/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed a variety of usability evaluation methods, metrics, and measurement techniques for systems designed for hospital staff to assess inpatient clinical condition. It found a lack of consistency within the field of electronic health record systems evaluation, and suggested that standardized processes could improve evaluation and comparison of these systems.
Background and objectives Electronic healthcare records have become central to patient care. Evaluation of new systems include a variety of usability evaluation methods or usability metrics (often referred to interchangeably as usability components or usability attributes). This study reviews the breadth of usability evaluation methods, metrics, and associated measurement techniques that have been reported to assess systems designed for hospital staff to assess inpatient clinical condition. Methods Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Open Grey from 1986 to 2019. For included studies, we recorded usability evaluation methods or usability metrics as appropriate, and any measurement techniques applied to illustrate these. We classified and described all usability evaluation methods, usability metrics, and measurement techniques. Study quality was evaluated using a modified Downs and Black checklist. Results The search identified 1336 studies. After abstract screening, 130 full texts were reviewed. In the 51 included studies 11 distinct usability evaluation methods were identified. Within these usability evaluation methods, seven usability metrics were reported. The most common metrics were ISO9241-11 and Nielsen's components. An additional usefulness metric was reported in almost 40% of included studies. We identified 70 measurement techniques used to evaluate systems. Overall study quality was reflected in a mean modified Downs and Black checklist score of 6.8/10 (range 1-9) 33% studies classified as high-quality (scoring eight or higher), 51% studies moderate-quality (scoring 6-7), and the remaining 16% (scoring below five) were low-quality. Conclusion There is little consistency within the field of electronic health record systems evaluation. This review highlights the variability within usability methods, metrics, and reporting. Standardized processes may improve evaluation and comparison electronic health record systems and improve their development and implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据