4.5 Article

Carbon Nanotube Supported Li-Excess Cation-Disordered Li1.24Fe0.38Ti0.38O2 Cathode with Enhanced Lithium-Ion Storage Performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 5029-5036

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-021-08975-9

关键词

Cation-disordered; Li-Fe-Ti oxides; carbon nanotube; cathode materials; lithium ion batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674147]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province [19KJB480013]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incorporating carbon nanotubes into Li-excess Li1.24Fe0.38Ti0.38O2 cathode material improves its conductivity and ion diffusion, leading to enhanced cycling stability and rate performance. The refined nanoparticles loaded in a conductive network facilitate charge transfer and ion diffusion in the cathode, resulting in improved reversible capacity and cycling stability.
The use of Li-excess approach can achieve efficient lithium ion storage of cation-disordered rock-salt cathode materials. However, their application is limited by poor intrinsic electronic conductivity and insufficient Li-ion diffusion. Herein, a carbon nanotube is incorporated in the Li-excess Li1.24Fe0.38Ti0.38O2 cathode material, resulting in the formation of refined Li1.24Fe0.38Ti0.38O2 nanoparticles that are well loaded in a continuous conductive network. This facilitates the charge transfer and ion diffusion in the cathode. The as-prepared Li1.24Fe0.38Ti0.38O2/carbon nanotube (LFT/CNT) cathode, therefore, delivers significantly enhanced rate capability with a reversible capacity of 108 mAh g(-1) after 200 cycles at 1 C compared to 36 mAh g(-1) of the as-prepared LFT cathode. The result of ex situ x-ray diffraction demonstrates the reversible and small lattice volume change of the LFT/CNT cathode during cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据