4.5 Article

Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from a healthcare region in Hong Kong

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-015-2550-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health and Medical Research Fund of Food and Health Bureau of Government of the HKSAR
  2. RGC Collaborative Research Fund Project on Syndromic Surveillance and Modelling for Infectious Diseases [CityU8/CRF/12G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae represents a major public health issue. This study investigated the clonality and resistance mechanisms of 92 carbapenem-resistant E. coli (n = 21) and K. pneumoniae (n = 71) isolates collected consecutively from clinical specimens and patients at high risk of carriage between 2010 and 2012 in a healthcare region in Hong Kong. Combined disk tests (CDTs) and the Carba NP test were used for phenotypic detection of carbapenemases. PCR assays were used to detect carbapenemase genes. All isolates were intermediate or resistant to at least one carbapenem. Nine (9.8 %) isolates were genotypic carbapenemase producers and included six K. pneumoniae (one ST1306/bla(IMP-4), one ST889/bla(IMP-4), two ST11/bla(KPC-2), one ST258/bla(KPC-2), one ST483/bla(NDM-1)) and three E. coli (one ST131/bla(IMP-4), two ST744/bla(NDM-1)) isolates. All nine isolates carrying carbapenemase genes could be detected by the CDTs and the Carba NP test. PCR identified bla(CTX-M) and bla(AmpC) alone or in combination in 77.8 % (7/9) and 96.4 % (80/83) of the carbapenemase-producers and non-producers, respectively. Porin loss was detected in 22.2%(2/9) and 59.0 % (49/83) of the carbapenemase-producers and non-producers, respectively. Overall, the E. coli clones were diverse (14 different STs), but 36.6 % (26/71) of the K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to ST11. In conclusion, the prevalence of carbapenemases among carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli and K. pneumoniae remained low in Hong Kong. Porin loss combined with AmpC and/or CTX-M type ESBL was the major mechanism of carbapenem resistance in the study population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据