4.6 Article

The Impact of Vedolizumab on COVID-19 Outcomes Among Adult IBD Patients in the SECURE-IBD Registry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 1877-1884

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab071

关键词

Inflammatory bowel disease; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; coronavirus disease 2019; vedolizumab; outcomes

资金

  1. Helmsley Charitable Trust [2003-04445]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR002489, T32DK007634, K23KD111995-01A1]
  3. Pfizer
  4. Takeda
  5. Janssen
  6. Abbvie
  7. Lilly
  8. Genentech
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim
  10. Bristol Myers Squibb
  11. Celtrion
  12. Arenapharm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that COVID-19 outcomes in IBD patients on VDZ were comparable to those on all other therapies. Compared to anti-TNF monotherapy, VDZ monotherapy was more likely to result in hospitalization, but less likely to result in severe COVID-19. Overall, VDZ appears to be safe in IBD patients with COVID-19.
Background: The impact of immune-modifying therapies on outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] is variable. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of vedolizumab [VDZ], a gut-selective anti-integrin, on COVID-19 outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients. Methods: Using data from the Surveillance of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion for IBD [SECURE-IBD], an international registry of IBD patients with confirmed COVID-19, we studied the impact of VDZ on COVID-19 hospitalization and severe COVID-19 [intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation and/or death]. Results: Of 3647 adult patients on any IBD medication in the registry, 457 [12.5%] patients were on VDZ. On multivariable analyses using backward selection of covariates, VDZ use was not associated with hospitalization or severe COVID-19 when compared with patients on all other medications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71, 1.1 and aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.53, 1.73, respectively). On comparing VDZ monotherapy to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] monotherapy, the odds for hospitalization, but not severe COVID-19, were higher [aOR CI 1.39; 95% CI 1.001, 1.90 and aOR 2.92; 95% CI 0.98, 8.71, respectively]. In an exploratory analysis, VDZ monotherapy, compared to anti-TNF monotherapy, was associated with new-onset gastrointestinal symptoms at the time of COVID-19, especially among patients whose IBD was in remission. Conclusions: COVID-19 outcomes among IBD patients on VDZ are comparable to those on all other therapies. Hospitalization, but not severe COVID-19, is more likely with VDZ monotherapy than with anti-TNF monotherapy. Overall, VDZ appears to be safe in IBD patients with COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据