4.5 Review

Neuroin fl ammation, neuronal damage or cognitive impairment associated with mechanical ventilation: A systematic review of evidence from animal studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 246-255

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.12.017

关键词

Mechanical ventilation; Neuroinflammation; Neuronal damage; Cognitive impairment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animal studies suggest that mechanical ventilation may lead to neuroinflammation, neuronal damage, and cognitive impairment, especially with sub-optimal settings. Further research with appropriate methodology is needed for serum monitoring strategies.
Purpose: Long-term cognitive impairment isa complication of critical illness survivors. Beside its lifesaving role, mechanical ventilation has potential complications. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence collected in animal studies that correlate mechanical ventilation with neuroinflammation, neuronal damage and cognitive impairment. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies published from inception until August 31st, 2020, that enrolled mechanically ventilated animals and reported on neuroinflammation or neuronal damage markers changes or cognitive-behavioural impairment. Results: Of 5583 studies, 11 met inclusion criteria. Mice, rats, pigs were used. Impact of MV: 4 out of 7 studies re -ported higher neuroinflammation markers in MV-treated animals and 3 studies reported no differences; 7 out of 8 studies reported a higher neuronal damage and 1 reported no differences; 2 out of 2 studies reported cognitive decline up to 3 days after MV. Higher Tidal volumes are associated with higher changes in brain or serum markers. Conclusion: Preclinical evidence suggests that MV induces neuroinflammation, neuronal damage and cognitive impairment and these are worsened if sub-optimal MV settings are applied. Future studies, with appropriate methodology, are necessary to evaluate for serum monitoring strategies. Trial registration num & ouml;er: CRD42019148935. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据