4.6 Article

Testing clockwork axion with gravitational waves

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/049

关键词

cosmological phase transitions; axions; gravitational waves / experiments; Cosmic strings; domain walls; monopoles

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan [MOST108-2112-M-002-005-MY3, 109-2811-M-002-550]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the gravitational waves produced by the Peccei-Quinn phase transition associated with the clockwork axion. The results show that GWs at different scales can be detected by different interferometers, and experimental data has excluded a significant portion of parameter space.
We investigate the gravitational waves (GWs) produced from the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) phase transition associated with the clockwork axion. The PQ phase transition can be first-order when the dimension-6 operator is included into the scalar potential. The GWs from the PQ phase transition at scale in the range of 10(3) - 10(6) GeV are detectable for the BBO and ALIA interferometers. The LISA and Taiji interferometers can probe the GWs from the PQ scale f less than or similar to 10(4) GeV, while the GW signals from the scale f greater than or similar to 10(5) GeV can be detected by the ground-based GW observatories ET and CE. We find that the parameter space kappa(m) similar to 0.06 - 0.001, kappa(l) similar to 0.04 - 0.001, and epsilon similar to 0.1 - 0.01 at the scale f = 10(5) GeV and most of the parameter regions at the scale f = 10(6) GeV have been excluded by the LIGO O2 run. The LIGO O3 and design phases can further probe the remaining parameter space. We show that the GWs from the annihilation of domain walls with a PQ scale f similar or equal to 2 x 10(5) GeV can induce the stochastic signals with the right amplitude for the NANOGrav 12.5-year observations, but having a steeper spectral slope than the observations. The LIGO O3 run has the opportunity of detecting the GW signals from the first-order PQ phase transition around this scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据