4.7 Review

Developments in the life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste e A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126163

关键词

Chemical recycling; Feedstock recycling; Plastic recycling; Life cycle assessment; Plastic circular economy

资金

  1. University of Bath, United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on chemical recycling of plastics has increased in the past decade, with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology playing an important role in understanding the environmental impacts. Different approaches to modeling chemical recycling processes were identified, highlighting the need for further research on other methods like gasification and depolymerization to improve data availability and LCA modeling comparisons.
Research into chemical recycling of plastic has increased over the last decade. At the same time, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and application has developed and LCA continues to be an important tool for understanding the environmental impacts of materials and processes. LCA of chemical recycling processes is a growing area and this review gives a critical summary of the current research status. It is highlighted that there is confusion with nomenclature, with chemical recycling and feedstock recycling being used interchangeably to mean the processes of pyrolysis, gasification, hydrocracking or depoly-merization of plastic waste. However, the two terms are rarely mentioned together. This causes incon-sistency and a lack of visibility in the literature, confusion over term definitions and which term to use. Consequently, terminology use needs to be tightened. A critical analysis of nine chemical recycling LCA papers found that there are two approaches to modelling: a comparison of chemical recycling methods to other plastic waste management techniques, for example mechanical recycling, or the modelling of chemical recycling methods in combination with other plastic waste management methods, to treat mixed plastic waste. The direct comparison of chemical recycling methods and mechanical recycling is no longer valuable. Chemical recycling supports mechanical recycling by recycling plastic waste, which is not mechanically recycled, therefore there is no need to determine which method is best. Pyrolysis is the most researched chemical recycling method, as well as being the most common method modelled using LCA. Pyrolysis is often highlighted as the best chemical recycling method. It was concluded that there may be unintentional bias in these results due to more and higher quality data availability for pyrolysis. Therefore, further research on gasification, depolymerization and hydrocracking of plastic waste is needed to increase data availability and quality and enable better LCA modelling comparisons. Crown Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据