4.7 Article

Pricing and inventory planning for non-instantaneous deteriorating products with greening investment: A case study in beef industry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126368

关键词

Inventory planning; Non-instantaneous deteriorating items; Pricing; Greenness level; Partially backlogged shortage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the problem of pricing and inventory planning for a vendor of non-instantaneous deteriorating items under partially backlogged shortages with greening investment. By formulating a non-linear optimization model and utilizing analytical methods, the study finds the optimal solution and explores the impact of greening costs on demand and total profit for the vendor.
This paper studies the problem of pricing and inventory planning for a vendor of non-instantaneous deteriorating items under partially backlogged shortages with greening investment. The demand of customers and inventory control variables are affected by greening programs. The primary objective of this paper is to determine the optimal sales price, replenishment schedule, and order quantity per in-ventory cycle under different greenness levels, which will help maximize the vendor's total profit. The problem is formulated as a non-linear optimization model in which an analytical approach is applied in order to find the optimal solution. Using several mathematical theorems, it has been proven that the optimal solution not only exists but also is unique. In order to show the efficacy of the proposed model, a real case study in the round beef industry is analyzed. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to help find managerial insights. The results indicate the range of greening cost that positively influences the demand and total profit for the vendor. Additionally, the vendor's inventory planning is designed and differentiated according to the demand function and greenness level. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据