4.7 Article

The impact of shopping motivation on sustainable consumption: A study in the context of green apparel

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126239

关键词

Green apparel; Hedonic motivation; Purchase intention; Sustainable consumption; Shopping motivation; Utilitarian motivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of shopping motivation on consumers' intention to buy green apparel, finding that information availability and customized offerings significantly influence utilitarian motivation, while adventure, authority, and status significantly impact hedonic motivation. Gender and family income were identified as moderating factors in these relationships.
The study aims to investigate the impact of shopping motivation on consumers' intention to buy green apparel. The study adopted the theory of shopping motivation (utilitarian and hedonic motivation) as a framework. Further, the moderating roles of gender and family income were also examined in all the studied relationships. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings indicate a significant impact of information availability and customized offerings on utilitarian motivation, along with a significant impact of adventure, authority, and status on hedonic motivation. Both shopping motivations, utilitarian and hedonic, influence purchase intention regarding green apparel. Gender was found to have a moderating relationship for information availability with utilitarian motivation and for authority and status with hedonic motivation. The moderating effect of income was also confirmed. The findings will help managers and practitioners promote sustainable consumption through green apparel. This may, in turn, foster the cleaner production and practices of sustainable consumption, which is beneficial for the planet and people. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据